Il maestro Francesco Chieppa a Montecassino

Evento segnalato da RCapitanio in data 09-03-2011

Il maestro Francesco Chieppa, il giorno 29/03/2011 alle ore 16, eseguirà una performance dal vivo nel favoloso scenario dell'Abbazia di Montecassino. L'artista realizzerà un dipinto su tela (dimensioni 2 metri per due) interamente dal vivo e alla presenza degli spettatori che vorranno assistere all'evento. L'opera sarà messa all'asta il cui ricavato verrà interamente devoluto alla Parrocchia di san Pietro di Cassino (FR) per il rifacimento del tetto della chiesa.

COSA: Beneficenza; DOVE: Italia->Lazio->Provincia di Frosinone->Cassino; DATA: 29-03-2011;


When I first saw this title Wedding City Wedding Photos, design and more on gg
When I first saw this title Wedding City Wedding Photos, design and more on gglooe I just whent and bookmark it.Can I just say what a reduction to find someone who truly knows what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know how to deliver a problem to gentle and make it important. Extra individuals need to learn this and perceive this aspect of the story. I cant consider youre not more in style since you definitely have the gift. [url=]cusbtqvri[/url] [link=]wakqjny[/link]

Commento inserito da BgYAaGIb in data 2013-09-09 06:17:57

Wait, I cannot fathom it being so stiwrghtforaard.
Wait, I cannot fathom it being so stiwrghtforaard.

Commento inserito da dszABxthb in data 2013-09-05 14:32:51

Another sham independent cososimimn.Just about everyone on this so-called ind
Another sham independent cososimimn.Just about everyone on this so-called independent NYC Charter Revision Commission is beholden to, falls under the direct influence of, or is under the command of an elected official or government-funded entity. Indeed, its Chair is the Chancellor of the City University of Higher Education (CUNY) a wholly-owned subsidiary of state and city government. How is it, then, by any stretch of the imagination, to be regarded as an independent cososimimn? And, how many times will the self-interested elected officials insist on a reconsideration of the People's Term Limits Law? Voters voted in the course of two referenda that we wanted our city's elected officials to serve no more than two successive terms in the same office and then the officials would have to exit either serve in another elected office or else go get jobs elsewhere (anywhere) or else GO HOME. Despite the people's votes in the two citywide referenda, and notwithstanding that every opinion poll since these two referenda, to date, has reaffirmed voters' strong support for the TWO successive term limits that we imposed on the offices of Mayor, Public Advocate, Controller, Borough Presidents, and members of the City Council, the politicians (many of them whose terms were nearing an end) arrogantly joined forces with Mayor Bloomberg and legislatively overturned the People's Term Limits Law. Hence, the City Council, on its own, voted to extend the number of terms in office for themselves and for all the other officials to THREE successive terms (from the limit of two). That bold and self-serving action was urged upon them and signed into law by Mayor Bloomberg. Regrettably, this legislative override of a referendum was upheld by the courts. Thus, our elected officials by overturning the voters' term limits law thwarted the the people's will. The very next election cycle, the voters showed their great displeasure with the politicians; voters tossed out several incumbents in the City Council a rarity they who had voted to extend the number of terms they could serve in the City Council. Even City Council Speaker Christine Quinn (who had engineered the overturning of the People's Term Limits Law in the City Council) found herself in electoral difficulty; she eked out a narrow victory in a primary contest against two unknown rivals. And, then, in the general election, the allegedly wildly popular Mayor Bloomberg narrowly won reelection to a third term. Now, the narrowly re-elected third-term Mayor Bloomberg (once a supporter of term limits) has appointed yet another cososimimn to look yet again at city governance meaning they will look AGAIN at term limits, no doubt, with a view toward lifting term limits altogether. These pols and their surrogates toy with the people's wrath at their own peril. We should be appalled that this so-called independent City Charter Review Commission is comprised in the main of persons who individually answer to government officials or who (such as is the case with the CUNY Chancellor and the Chairman of the NYC Civilian Complaint Review Board a mayoral agency depend on government funding for their respective institutions' support and budgets. What a waste of taxpayers' money to fund this charade and pretense at updating city governance and structures! Michael Meyers, Manhattan, New York. [url=]wtyewha[/url] [link=]crjvprsipqc[/link]

Commento inserito da uD5HbNaGAL in data 2013-09-04 21:21:35

If that's a hard line, God help these five boroughs. This cosmmision is on the
If that's a hard line, God help these five boroughs. This cosmmision is on the way to drafting a new city charter without any public input and with oversight coming from three daily newspapers whose editiorial boards have already decided what to include in the new document. Meantime, Mr. Fiala's prescription for hard-working New Yorkers is to spend the summer with him and his mayoral agency as they strip away what little democracy presently exists in city government.

Commento inserito da P5oiLiOw9vMI in data 2013-09-03 11:22:43

Inserisci un tuo commento all'evento.
Ricorda che sei responsabile di ciò che scrivi. Usa il buon senso!

Il tuo nome (Oppure un nick, max 24 car.)

Titolo breve del commento (max 80 car.)

Commento (Non essere volgare; usa il buon senso)

Il tuo indirizzo email

Trascrivi il codice di controllo

Consuma meno energia e risparmia sulla bolletta!